Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: FEINSTINES BILL 1-3- 2013

  1. #1
    No Hope For Me 1biggun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    13,586
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)

    Default FEINSTINES BILL 1-3- 2013

    FROM THE NRA IM TOLD IN A EMAIL I GOT





    Feinstein Goes For Broke With New Gun-Ban Bill




    Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)—author of the federal “assault weapon” and “large” ammunition magazine ban of 1994-2004—has announced that on the first day of the new Congress—January 3rd— she will introduce a bill to which her 1994 ban will pale by comparison. On Dec. 17th, Feinstein said, “I have been working with my staff for over a year on this legislation” and “It will be carefully focused.” Indicating the depth of her research on the issue, she said on Dec. 21st that she had personally looked at pictures of guns in 1993, and again in 2012.

    According to a Dec. 27th posting on Sen. Feinstein’s website and a draft of the bill obtained by NRA-ILA, the new ban would, among other things, adopt new definitions of “assault weapon” that would affect a much larger variety of firearms, require current owners of such firearms to register them with the federal government under the National Firearms Act, and require forfeiture of the firearms upon the deaths of their current owners. Some of the changes in Feinstein’s new bill are as follows:

    Reduces, from two to one, the number of permitted external features on various firearms. The 1994 ban permitted various firearms to be manufactured only if they were assembled with no more than one feature listed in the law. Feinstein’s new bill would prohibit the manufacture of the same firearms with even one of the features.

    Adopts new lists of prohibited external features. For example, whereas the 1994 ban applied to a rifle or shotgun the “pistol grip” of which “protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon,” the new bill would drastically expand the definition to include any “grip . . . or any other characteristic that can function as a grip.” Also, the new bill adds “forward grip” to the list of prohibiting features for rifles, defining it as “a grip located forward of the trigger that functions as a pistol grip.” Read literally and in conjunction with the reduction from two features to one, the new language would apply to every detachable-magazine semi-automatic rifle. At a minimum, it would, for example, ban all models of the AR-15, even those developed for compliance with California’s highly restrictive ban.


    Carries hyperbole further than the 1994 ban. Feinstein’s 1994 ban listed “grenade launcher” as one of the prohibiting features for rifles. Her 2013 bill carries goes even further into the ridiculous, by also listing “rocket launcher.” Such devices are restricted under the National Firearms Act and, obviously, are not standard components of the firearms Feinstein wants to ban. Perhaps a subsequent Feinstein bill will add “nuclear bomb,” “particle beam weapon,” or something else equally far-fetched to the features list.




    Expands the definition of “assault weapon” by including:


    Three very popular rifles: The M1 Carbine (introduced in 1944 and for many years sold by the federal government to individuals involved in marksmanship competition), a model of the Ruger Mini-14, and most or all models of the SKS.


    Any “semiautomatic, centerfire, or rimfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds,” except for tubular-magazine .22s.


    Any “semiautomatic, centerfire, or rimfire rifle that has an overall length of less than 30 inches,” any “semiautomatic handgun with a fixed magazine that has the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds,” and any semi-automatic handgun that has a threaded barrel.

    Requires owners of existing “assault weapons” to register them with the federal government under the National Firearms Act (NFA). The NFA imposes a $200 tax per firearm, and requires an owner to submit photographs and fingerprints to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE), to inform the BATFE of the address where the firearm will be kept, and to obtain the BATFE’s permission to transport the firearm across state lines.


    Prohibits the transfer of “assault weapons.” Owners of other firearms, including those covered by the NFA, are permitted to sell them or pass them to heirs. However, under Feinstein’s new bill, “assault weapons” would remain with their current owners until their deaths, at which point they would be forfeited to the government.


    Prohibits the domestic manufacture and the importation of magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The 1994 ban allowed the importation of such magazines that were manufactured before the ban took effect. Whereas the 1994 ban protected gun owners from errant prosecution by making the government prove when a magazine was made, the new ban includes no such protection. The new ban also requires firearm dealers to certify the date of manufacture of any >10-round magazine sold, a virtually impossible task, given that virtually no magazines are stamped with their date of manufacture.


    Targets handguns in defiance of the Supreme Court. The Court ruled in District of Columbia v. Heller that the Second Amendment protects the right to have handguns for self-defense, in large part on the basis of the fact handguns are the type of firearm “overwhelmingly chosen by American society for that lawful purpose.” Semi-automatic pistols, which are the most popular handguns today, are designed to use detachable magazines, and the magazines “overwhelmingly chosen” by Americans for self-defense are those that hold more than 10 rounds. Additionally, Feinstein’s list of nearly 1,000 firearms exempted by name (see next paragraph) contains not a single handgun. Sen. Feinstein advocated banning handguns before being elected to the Senate, though she carried a handgun for her own personal protection.

    Contains a larger piece of window dressing than the 1994 ban. Whereas the 1994 ban included a list of approximately 600 rifles and shotguns exempted from the ban by name, the new bill’s list is increased to nearly 1,000 rifles and shotguns. Other than for the 11 detachable-magazine semi-automatic rifles and one other semi-automatic rifle included in the list, however, the list appears to be pointless, because a separate provision of the bill exempts “any firearm that is manually operated by bolt, pump, lever, or slide action.”



    The Department of Justice study. On her website, Feinstein claims that a study for the DOJ found that the 1994 ban resulted in a 6.7 percent decrease in murders. To the contrary, this is what the study said: “At best, the assault weapons ban can have only a limited effect on total gun murders, because the banned weapons and magazines were never involved in more than a modest fraction of all gun murders. Our best estimate is that the ban contributed to a 6.7 percent decrease in total gun murders between 1994 and 1995. . . . However, with only one year of post-ban data, we cannot rule out the possibility that this decrease reflects chance year-to-year variation rather than a true effect of the ban. Nor can we rule out effects of other features of the 1994 Crime Act or a host of state and local initiatives that took place simultaneously.”


    “Assault weapon” numbers and murder trends. From the imposition of Feinstein’s “assault weapon” ban (Sept. 13, 1994) through the present, the number of “assault weapons” has risen dramatically. For example, the most common firearm that Feinstein considers an “assault weapon” is the AR-15 rifle, the manufacturing numbers of which can be gleaned from the BATFE’s firearm manufacturer reports, available here. From 1995 through 2011, the number of AR-15s—all models of which Feinstein’s new bill defines as “assault weapons”—rose by over 2.5 million. During the same period, the nation’s murder rate fell 48 percent, to a 48-year low. According to the FBI, 8.5 times as many people are murdered with knives, blunt objects and bare hands, as with rifles of any type.





    Traces: Feinstein makes several claims, premised on firearm traces, hoping to convince people that her 1994 ban reduced the (relatively infrequent) use of “assault weapons” in crime. However, traces do not indicate how often any type of gun is used in crime. As the Congressional Research Service and the BATFE have explained, not all firearms that are traced have been used in crime, and not all firearms used in crime are traced. Whether a trace occurs depends on whether a law enforcement agency requests that a trace be conducted. Given that existing “assault weapons” were exempted from the 1994 ban and new “assault weapons” continued to be made while the ban was in effect, any reduction in the percentage of traces accounted for by “assault weapons” during the ban, would be attributable to law enforcement agencies losing interest in tracing the firearms, or law enforcement agencies increasing their requests for traces on other types of firearms, as urged by the BATFE for more than a decade.


    Call Your U.S. Senators and Representative: As noted, Feinstein intends to introduce her bill on January 3rd. President Obama has said that gun control will be a “central issue” of his final term in office, and he has vowed to move quickly on it.



    Contact your members of Congress at 202-224-3121 to urge them to oppose Sen. Feinstein’s 2013 gun and magazine ban. Our elected representatives in Congress must here from you if we are going to defeat this gun ban proposal. You can write your Representatives and Senators by using our Write Your Representatives tool here: NRA-ILA | Write Your Reps

    Millions of Americans own so-called “assault weapons” and tens of millions own “large” magazines, for self-defense, target shooting, and hunting. For more information about the history of the “assault weapon” issue, please visit Home Page.

  2. #2
    Gunco Veteran AK Builder FloridaAKM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Sunny North Florida
    Posts
    2,132
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)

    Default

    Thanks for posting BigGun!

    "If God had not intended for us to eat animals, how come He made them out of meat?" - Sarah Palin
    New Member of the Busted Box Club

  3. #3
    No Hope For Me 1biggun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    13,586
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)

    Default

    IF PASSED WERE THE HELL WILL I GET $200 PER GUN THAT FITS THOSE DESCRIPTIONS????????? HELL EVEN ONE OF MY 10-22 RUGERS FITS THE DESCRIPTION.
    IM NOT SURE WERE MY THUMBHOLE 10-22 TARGET STOCK COME INTO PLAY.




    BANNING M1 CARBINES THEY HAVE NO EVIL FEATURES NO PISTOL GRIPS.

    ILL NEED A LOT OF MONEY TO REGISTER THEM. AT $ 200 EACH.
    CANT TRANFER THEM AN FORFET WHEN YOU DIE????? NEED PERMISSION TO TAKE OUT OF STATE THERE GOES MY VARMINT HUNTING .

    HOW MANY VARMINT AN TARGET ARS ARE OUT THERE BING USED IN COMPITIION A FOR HUNTING???????????????????????????

  4. #4
    THE 9mm ADDICT MUSIBIKE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,808
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)

    Default

    So, we must get a TAX stamp for all guns now?
    M U S I B I K E

  5. #5
    GuncoHolic twa2471's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    4,519
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)

    Default

    Getting nutty-er all the time,, get writing to your reps,, for the thousanth time!!!!!!

  6. #6
    Always sore, always tired Bradrock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Missouri/ Ark border
    Posts
    6,067
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)

    Default

    Is this why so many new forum members around the web looking to bend flats again?? Seems like a re awakening of kit building /assembling lately.
    " Save a tree...........Eat A Beaver!"

  7. #7
    No Hope For Me 1biggun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    13,586
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)

    Default

    So, we must get a TAX stamp for all guns now?
    NOPE JUST THE 900 PLUS ON HER LIST PLUS ANYTHING ELSE THAT FITS THE DESCRIPTION ON HERE LIST. SHE LEAVIN PUMPS, LEVER,BOLT ACTIONS OUT OF IT. IF THE BILL PASSES IN A FEW YEARS WHEN CRIMINAL ARE USING SHOT GUNS AN DEER RILFES SHE WIULL WRITE A BILL SAYNG THERE TOW DANGERIOUS AN THEN THERE WILL LIKELY BE SOME AMMO LAWS COMING. HOW LONG BEFORE THEY BAN HAND LOADING ?????????

    WE MIGHT BE SEEING A FEW AK PUMP ACTION CONVERSIONS IN THE FUTURE

  8. #8
    Always sore, always tired Bradrock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Missouri/ Ark border
    Posts
    6,067
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)

    Default

    One more communist Supreme court judge and it's over anyhow....
    And don't think Barry will ever leave office without that happening.....

    So yeah write all the letters you can, but try to enjoy life a bit too. Because it's allready too late to save the U.S. in our lifetimes.
    These fucking pinko fag hippies have been setting the table for fifty years .
    The schools are loaded
    The courts are loaded
    The media is loaded & the God Damned Republicans can not even field a decent candidate.

    Write a fucking letter....yeah right......
    " Save a tree...........Eat A Beaver!"

  9. #9
    No Hope For Me 1biggun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    13,586
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)

    Default

    Is this why so many new forum members around the web looking to bend flats again?? Seems like a re awakening of kit building /assembling lately.
    IF THOSE KITS DONT GET BUILT YOU CANT HAVE THEM READY TO REGISTER OR GRAND FATHER IN,

    THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF UNBUILT KITS THAT ARE NOT GOING TO BE LEGA;LY WORTH A SHIT IF THESE LAWS PASS.

    YOU MIGHT BE ABALE TO BUILD A PUMP OUT OF THEM. IMY GUESS IS THEY WILL SOME HOW BAN ANY THING WITH A RECIVER THAT CAN BE SEMI AUTO ALSO ID NOT BE SUPRISED TO SEE NDS AN OTHER 100% RECIVERS ON A LIST

  10. #10
    Gunco Regular Jim Mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    611
    Feedback Score
    0

    Default

    I doubt if it went thru that they would make you bring every gun in and have it inspected for function. Your proabably talking about a bunch of clerks just taking peoples money and assigning numbers. And again taking more of our money, since even the political folks this would be just a touchy feel good thing that doesnt really do anything.
    You would think if these political types really cared, isnt it a fact that each day over 30 people (children included) die from alcohol related car crashes? These folks fail to mention that. But then again there is just tooo much money involved with the folks that distill and brew alcohol to offend them. So go after the evil gun owners. jim

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Search tags for this page

There are currently no search engine referrals.
Click on a term to search our site for related topics.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •