Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: LaRue Tactical NEWS RELEASE

  1. #1
    GuncoHolic Black Blade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    4,272
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)

    Default LaRue Tactical NEWS RELEASE

    LaRue Tactical NEWS RELEASE

    LaRue Tactical

    NEWS RELEASE:

    02/08/2012 LEANDER, TX.

    Updated Policy for State and Local Agency Law Enforcement Sales:

    Due to the recent and numerous new Anti-gun/Anti-2nd Amendment laws passed and/or pending across our country, LaRue Tactical has been forced to reconsider how we provide products to state and local agencies.

    Effective today, in an effort to see that no legal mistakes are made by LaRue Tactical and/or its employees, we will apply all current State and Local Laws (as applied to civilians) to state and local law enforcement / government agencies. In other words, LaRue Tactical will limit all sales to what law-abiding citizens residing in their districts can purchase or possess.

    State and local laws have always been a serious focus of this firm, and we are now dovetailing that focus with the constitutional rights of the residents covered in their different areas by the old and new regulations.

    We realize this effort will have an impact on this firm's sales - and have decided the lost sales are less danger to this firm than potential lawsuits from erroneous shipments generated by something as simple as human error.

    Thanks in advance for your understanding.

    Mark LaRue

    * * This policy does not apply to Military / Federal Agencies * *
    When you're born you get a ticket to the freak show. When you're born in America , you get a front row seat. - George Carlin


  2. #2
    Gunco Veteran hunter_02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,413
    Feedback Score
    0

    Default

    Mr. Blade. Thanks for the post. As I cannot justify spending $3000 for an AR, I did just order a couple of range bags, explaining to them why, and also telling them I would appreciate it if they would do the same to the Feds and the Military, but that holding the states accountable was a good start.
    Hunter

  3. #3
    Gunco Good ole boy tanvil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    5,353
    Feedback Score
    20 (100%)

    Default

    AHHH, that is so cool. Every supplier should do this.

    Make those bastards buy from the likes of Sarco........

  4. #4
    Gunco Regular sovblocgunfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    515
    Feedback Score
    0

    Default

    That's pretty cool. I know Leander very well, and know it is a small town that hold pretty traditional values, even if it is next door to Austin.

    Good for them!

  5. #5
    Gunco Member wrench1957's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Twin Cities of Mpls-St. Paul
    Posts
    183
    Feedback Score
    0

    Default

    Way cool, I like it
    Do it before it is too late!
    Proud member of the NRA,GOA and JPFO!!!
    And now GOCRA in MN!!!!

  6. #6
    BANNED FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,458
    Feedback Score
    0

    Default

    Why exempt the Feds and military? I mean aren't the laws coming from the Feds and going to be enforced by the Feds?

    Seems kind of like a hollow statement to me.

  7. #7
    Gunco Veteran Bolt2bounce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    AmeriKA
    Posts
    1,927
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)

    Default

    good for them wish all manufactures would stand up and do this, ammo companies.. first and foremost just think if all those armed guards had no bullets...to protect those fat cats with... but it's a pipe dream.. I think ronny Barrett did this with the LAPD a few years ago.. in regards to his 50 cal M-82's also... no service on their weapon systems.. because they were pushing the anti 50 laws.. B2B

  8. #8
    AKAHOLIC o.d. ak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    South West Missouri
    Posts
    1,570
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FyredUp View Post
    Why exempt the Feds and military? I mean aren't the laws coming from the Feds and going to be enforced by the Feds?

    Seems kind of like a hollow statement to me.
    Probably dosen't seem so hollow to a police dept in NY or CA if they are trying to buy equipment ......

  9. #9
    3/6 Infantry mtdew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Benton,AR
    Posts
    2,661
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)

    Default

    Exellent!
    "NA BEAN DON CHAT GUN LAMHAINN"
    Clan MacPherson
    "CREAG DHUBH"!

  10. #10
    The Anti-Terrorist Abukai08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,651
    Feedback Score
    0

    Default

    Awesome. There has also been a push on Glock to do the same seeing as they are one of the largest suppliers of sidearms to Law Enforcement agencies. I don't know if it has been taken under consideration by Glock, but I know there has been a flow of letters and e-mails to the company.
    "What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?" -Thomas Jefferson-


    "Our rights come from our humanity and may not be legislated away -- not by a vote of Congress, not by the consensus of our neighbors, not even by agreement of all Americans but one." Judge Andrew P. Napolitano

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Search tags for this page

There are currently no search engine referrals.
Click on a term to search our site for related topics.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •