Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Complete >>"BS"<<

  1. #1
    Gunco Rookie RockstarAK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    17
    Feedback Score
    0

    Red face Complete >>"BS"<<

    Ok so I think I have heard this "Statment" now about 20 times and I think it is complete , This is it:


    " If you take a gun and shoot it straight up in the air
    It will come back to the ground, but moving twice
    as fast, as the speed it came out of the gun"

    I know this is complete But I just need someone to verify, just to make sure there isn't a whole explination to why it falls twice as fast as it went up.

    My "Hypothesis" if you will is that when you shoot a gun up in the air, the bullet was forced by the expanding force of blackpowder, But once it reached the falling point, there was not another force push it back down other then gravity. Which means that the maximum fall speed is around 150 mph tops, which is 204.39 FPS nearly nothing a gun can even achieve since it is such a low speed.

  2. #2
    Gunsmith Fritz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Salem, Oregon
    Posts
    1,095
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)

    Default

    You are correct, I am not sure about your numbers, but the fact is that an average bullet is fired at many many times the terminal velocity (maximum achievable speed from falling). It has no means to accelerate to any speed beyond its terminal velocity if it is accelerating only as a result of gravity. Mytbusters did a segment on just such an experiment. Not to say that Mythbusters are the supreme court of the physics world, but they did do this one. And because people who will argue this fact arent the sharpest tools in the shed, the best way to convince them they are wrong might just be with the talking box.

    Mythbusters Episode 50, "Bullets Fired Up, Vodka Myths III"

    Unofficial Mythbusters: Episode 50: Bullets Fired Up, Vodka Myths III

    Given enough space, even a bullet fired straight down, will decelerate to its terminal velocity.

  3. #3
    Gunco Good ole boy kernelkrink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    5,045
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)

    Default

    Saw that Mythbusters ep, the gist was all their straight up and down tests "proved" getting hit with a falling bullet was not fatal. However they had a surgeon who presented several cases where people had been hit in the skull with a "falling bullet" and died or been severely injured. I believe those were actually the result of bullets fired at an extreme angle to the horizon, not straight up. Just like Elmer Kieth using a .44 magnum revolver to shoot deer at 1000 yds plus, the trajectory resembles that of a mortar but there is still initial velocity from the shot behind the bullet.

  4. #4
    Gunsmith Fritz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Salem, Oregon
    Posts
    1,095
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kernelkrink View Post
    Saw that Mythbusters ep, the gist was all their straight up and down tests "proved" getting hit with a falling bullet was not fatal. However they had a surgeon who presented several cases where people had been hit in the skull with a "falling bullet" and died or been severely injured. I believe those were actually the result of bullets fired at an extreme angle to the horizon, not straight up. Just like Elmer Kieth using a .44 magnum revolver to shoot deer at 1000 yds plus, the trajectory resembles that of a mortar but there is still initial velocity from the shot behind the bullet.
    Well said Kernel.

Search tags for this page

There are currently no search engine referrals.
Click on a term to search our site for related topics.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •