Thanks for the FCG info. I was thinking of something like that but just using square tubing since I don't have any machining equipment.
I was thinking that about the receiver but had to ask.
And after seeing the internals I have to say WOW that is some really nice work, you did a great job on this.
Would love to see more pics, or even a video (hint, hint ).
DT, you never cease to amaze me with the guns you design. Only wish I had time to build one of all of each!! Still haven't had time to finish the two MG47s based on your version of them. Too busy making Crankfires. But since I do have some RPD topcovers, may just have to try the 5.45 cal. The ammo is surely cheap and plentiful enough!! Keep up the fine work!!!
Your XT74 is the slickest and most compact AK-based beltfed I've seen yet. I admire your machine skills and imagination. I love sideplate approach, and how it houses your 'FCG Module', Super slick.
Please be sure to post the range report! You've broken new ground **AGAIN**
I'm looking forward to seeing your MG47s. They go through ammo so fast I knew I needed one in 5.45.
Thanks Steve,
I owe it to you for motivating me.
I should get to the range in the next couple days and will work on posting pics and video.
For anyone building one similar. The two modifications required to feed 5.45 through the RPD cover were to narrow the slot in the feed tray and to pinch the links slightly to hold the rounds tightly.
Doubletapme
I like the way your FCG module goes up from the bottom. That would eliminate the outside grip stick and extra trigger on the ES version. I admire your workmanship and creativity in your builds. It is much better than mine.
I just got around to test firing it again yesterday. I can't believe it took a whole month to get around to it again. It ran about 96% but had several failures to eject. I will do some more fine tuning and try again. Its not done until it runs 100%.
I think I will make an aluminium heat sink sleeve like the japanese used in WW2 to help keep this small barrel from overheating.
It looks like you built a larger diameter gas tube coupled to a Tantal gas block. Did you have to do that to get enough shove to actual the feed cam with a smaller gas port because of the smaller bore than builders are useing on the various 7.62x39 MG47 version?
The gas tube I turned from a chunk of scrap. I did leave the side walls thicker and the receiver end was oversized and flats cut to slip tightly into the receiver. There is a tiny cap screw that locks the gas tube in position. The gas block is a Bulgy 90 degree with the lugs removed.
The 5.45 and 5.56 generate higher chamber pressures than the 7.62x39 and require a much smaller gas port. I actually chose to drill my gas port smaller than standard 74 because with the short gas system and full length barrel the piston receives a longer impulse duration and it worked out perfectly. I had to put a second spring in my buffer to keep the carrier from hitting the rear trunion.
Let me know if I didn't explain something completely. I am planning to tear it down again this week and will get pics of the gas tube removed from the weapon.
I thought I had already commented on this but I guess not... GOOD JOB! The AK-74 platform is (for now) an economical starting point. I have a belt-fed '74 on my really-long-range radar but just have too many other things to deal with right now.
THE BUILD LOOKS VERY NICE! Good job on everything. The carrier seems to have been the pain point on this one!
A few questions:
I see you moved the gas port back - did you plug weld the original port, or tap and screw a plug into place?
What is the velocity you are getting with this? I'm curious how significantly that changes the velocity since the gas is bleeding sooner.
Does that cause additional powder residue build-up in the gas system? I would think it does since the timing has changed... ?
What modifications do the belt links did you need to do? I don't know what RPD "U" style links means? Do you mean "normal" RPD links, or are there different versions?
The way I plug a gas port is to drive a tapered plug into the port and rosette weld over with the TIG. This method ensures the plug wont move at the moment you apply heat and the plug prevents the weld from sagging and causing an obstruction in the barrel. I like to get on the heat fast and complete the weld in about two seconds to minimize the heat affected zone. I allow the weld to air cool as I believe quenching would cause uneven stresses and possibly warp or otherwise harm accuracy. This method has always worked for me.
I don't have a chronograph so I can't say exactly but I would expect it to be the same as any other Bulgy 16" chrome lined barrel of equal bore dimension. The amount of gas that flows into the cylinder is extremely small and has no signifigant effect on muzzle velocity. In a properly timed weapon the bullet leaves the bore and bore pressure rapidly drops before the piston head has traveled even the half inch length of the cylinder. The gas cylinder pressure drops a couple thousandths of a second AFTER the bore pressure. If this were not the case the breech would be unlocked before the chamber pressure dropped and bad things would result.
There are many many factors that effect the timing and we can discuss them later. The point is that the bolt carrier in this build is slightly heavier and the belt feed mechanism adds resistance both of which increase the kinetic energy required to accelerate the carrier mass. By locating the gas port closer to the chamber it increased the impulse duration on the piston and allowed a shorter gas piston which helped reduce weight of the carrier mass. So it kept the timing closer to where I wanted it.
I know some would say to drill a larger gas port or cut the recoil spring but those methods do have shortcomings we can discuss later. Its past my bedtime.
I hope no one thinks Im trying to be a know it all as I have been misunderstood before. I'm just sharing my thoughts on designing custom builds of this sort.
What modifications do the belt links did you need to do? I don't know what RPD "U" style links means? Do you mean "normal" RPD links, or are there different versions?
The RPD links do come in two different styles. One style uses friction to hold the case against the L shaped rear of the link. The other style has a staytent formed in it that engages the extractor groove on the case to retain it. They are usually referred to as L style and U style based on their shape. I used the U style and squeezed each link just a little to reduce the inside diameter. It works great. Just go easy when you squeeze them or you will snap the spring steel.
The bolt, carrier, trunnion, barrel, gas system, etc. on these weapons are AK parts that have been modified to accommodate the RPD feed mechanism so I don’t really think it is incorrect to say it is based on an AK.
Looks incredible. How many hours of work went into the build?
I just worked on it in my spare time so it is hard to say exactly. I would guess maybe 30 or 40 hours in it spread out over many weeks. Working on custom builds is play time for me and I just wish I had more time to play.
I still haven't finished it. This build has not been out of the safe since those last pics were taken.
After the obamanation was elected I switched gears. I made gathering parts and building the great variety of weapons I wanted my priority. The final details including engraving and refinishing them will come later when time permits.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Gunco Forums
772.5K posts
34K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to AK-47 and AR-15 firearm owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!