Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 83

Thread: Milled Yugo M-70 pistol using cut receiver

  1. #11
    Gunco Member rapidrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    285
    Feedback Score
    0

    Default

    I seen a build (another site) where a guy painstakingly welded in rivits to simulate that hole

  2. #12
    Gunco Member rapidrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    285
    Feedback Score
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pirate56 View Post
    this is a milled receiver, there is no rear trunnion. as it is now it has all the select fire components intact and could be interpreted as building a full auto. when doing a receiver reconstruction you need to negate the fa features first.
    next you will be telling me there is no front trunion on a milled receiver

  3. #13
    Scheiße. Mr_Posthumous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,261
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)

    Default

    Its a solid milled piece of metal....that accommodate the parts for the rifle... The trunnions do the same thing, only for stamped receivers that otherwise lack the features.

  4. #14
    Gunco Regular The Dark Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    554
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rapidrus View Post
    next you will be telling me there is no front trunion on a milled receiver
    Not trying to be mean but there isn't. A trunnion is NOT a receiver or just any part of a gun that holds the barrel.


    I don't think it's a big deal but I would weld it up at this step for sure (which I figure he was going to because he put it on the internet).

    Nice welding.

  5. #15
    Gunco Veteran patjsimpson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,464
    Feedback Score
    25 (100%)

    Default

    We don't say this to be rude we say it because we don't want our "friends" here on the forum to do something that will get them in trouble unknowningly. ATF determination of what is intent to build a MG is thier own interpitation at the time so if you want to rule out any possible intent charges you should always start by filling in the pin and saftey sear channel as mentioned above. I think he is a great welder from the looks but I would just recomend changing the order around a little to be sure you don't get a battering ram on the door in the middle of the night ;-)

  6. #16
    No Hope For Me Coils's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    PA Where the Amish Roam Free
    Posts
    14,039
    Feedback Score
    38 (100%)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rapidrus View Post
    next you will be telling me there is no front trunion on a milled receiver
    There isn't
    "Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem" Ronald Reagan

  7. #17
    Gunco Member rapidrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    285
    Feedback Score
    0

    Default

    ok just for future reference what do we call the front and rear of a milled receiver? since everbody on site has corrected me, I'd hate to make this mistake again. you no 6, half dozen that sort of thing.

  8. #18
    Gunco Veteran patjsimpson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,464
    Feedback Score
    25 (100%)

    Default

    Front and rear stubs. Trunnion implies a stamped reciever build.

  9. #19
    Gunco Member rapidrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    285
    Feedback Score
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by patjsimpson View Post
    Front and rear stubs. Trunnion implies a stamped reciever build.
    like I said 6 or a half dozen what is the difference? Is it because Im not 1 of the boys that ever one wants to argue? if I took a front stub and cut it down ground it a little bit and used it on stamped receiver it would still be a stub?

  10. #20
    Gunco Veteran patjsimpson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,464
    Feedback Score
    25 (100%)

    Default

    In that case you could say you manufactured a trunnion. You can't do it with out modifying the stub so you could then call it I trunnion I guess. On a milled receiver you don't have a trunion so you only have to use 5 parts to make the gun 922r compliant vs 6 parts for a stamped receiver AK. The rear trunnion "stock tang" Is not a countable part.

Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast

Search tags for this page

There are currently no search engine referrals.
Click on a term to search our site for related topics.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •