View Single Post
 
Old 06-16-2008, 03:45 AM   #33 (permalink)
kkcalvin
Gunco Member
 
kkcalvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 121
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I don't think ATF would go after someone possessing a broken weapon unless they could prove that after the weapon broke Olofson kept it in a broken (full auto) state.
If Olofson knew that the rifle was broken and because of this was shooting full auto or in bursts then by law he was in possession of a machine gun and he should have immediately have it repaired.
kkcalvin is online now   Reply With Quote