Thread: New ATF regs?
View Single Post
 
Old 08-20-2008, 07:20 PM   #13 (permalink)
MCQ1
Gunco Member
 
MCQ1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 126
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I disagree. I can see needing an 01 to cover sending and receiving but I don't see where someone spraying a camo paint job on a turkey gun or taking that gun apart and putting it back together to facilitate the process has anything to do with manufacturing a firearm...for profit or not. Thats a pretty long stretch in my book...but I'm not the ATF or in the business of refinishing firearms.
MCQ1 is offline   Reply With Quote