Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: atf address????

  1. #11
    Gunco Veteran Markp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Somalia
    Posts
    1,840
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1biggun View Post
    I will post an y replies I get. the letter a read and is posted here smoe were says once a rifle always a rifle. like mentioned above. I had one time intended to makre a convertable set up but its on hold untill i get clarification
    I would love to see an outcome where if you have a receiver it can convert back and forth at will. That to me would be perfect.

    Mark

  2. #12
    No Hope For Me Coils's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    PA Where the Amish Roam Free
    Posts
    14,039
    Feedback Score
    38 (100%)

    Default

    If you would? please also ask about 100% receivers purchased through an FFL
    I can do that. some thing Like I have a rifle built on a previously unbuilt/virgin transferable reciver. is it leagal to sell this fire arm in a assembled configuration?????
    I would be real interested in the answer to this.

  3. #13
    No Hope For Me Coils's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    PA Where the Amish Roam Free
    Posts
    14,039
    Feedback Score
    38 (100%)

    Default

    I remembered seeing this and tought some of you would like to see it too.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  4. #14
    Gunco Maniac sjohnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    South Dakota
    Posts
    7,452
    Feedback Score
    15 (100%)

    Default

    But, will it really catch mice?
    I have a daughter. I tell her, "911 is what you dial after you're raped. 1911 is what you should have before they try."

  5. #15
    No Hope For Me 1biggun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    13,580
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)

    Default

    IF YOU HAD TWO THEY WOULD MAKE A REALLY GOOD PAIR OF CRUTCHES

    IM SORRY BUT IF I BUILT AN EXACT COPY OF A THOMPSON CONTENDER PISTOL RIFLE COMBO I FEEL THAT I SHOULD BE ABLE TO THE EXACT SAME THING WITH IT AS I CAN WITH THE ORIGINAL. BY THAT WAY OF THINKING I FEEL THAT ONE SHOULD BE ABLE TO APPLY THE SAME RULES TO ANY PISTOL. i WOULD UNDER STAND IF IT HAD STARTED LIFE AS A RIFLE. THE FACT IS IF I WERE TO BUILD ,MY PISTOL REGISTERD NDS RECIVER INTO A RIFLE AFTER IT BEING A PISTOL AND THEN STRIPED DOWN TO BARE RECIVER THEY WOULD CALL IT A PISTOL BY WHAT THE SERIAL NUMBERS COME UP IN THERE DATA BASE. SO FOR THEM TO SAY ITS A RIFLE BECUSER IT ONCE HAD A STOCK AND 16 INCH BARREL IS STUPID AND A MOCKERY OF MAKING ME REGISTER IT IN THE FIRST PLACE. THE FACT THAT ARE IGNORING PRECIDENT SET BY THE THOMPSON CASE REALLY MAKES ME FEEL THAT THEY THE ATF IS NOT HELD TO ANY LAWS OR JUDGEMENTS

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Search tags for this page

There are currently no search engine referrals.
Click on a term to search our site for related topics.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •