Originally Posted by jrs
I beg to differ, Moleman. He did not get a fair trial, or presumption of innocence until proven guilty in a court of law. The LEOs acted as judge, jury and executioner of Dorner. Essentially they went after him from the beginning with a silent, tacit, 'kill on sight' mentality. If this wasn't the case, those two women delivering newspapers wouldn't have been shot. Nor would the man that just cleared a check point have had his vehicle rammed.
So you're saying it was Dorner that made the police officers shoot those women and ram the vehicle of the man? That they shouldn't be held accountable for their actions since Dorner made them do it?
I suggest you all think about the abuse of power that just occurred in this instance and decide if you want this type of 'law enforcement' to continue in the future.
Are you suggesting that because he didn't get a fair shake 4-5 years ago it was ok for him to go on a killing spree? I agree the idiots who rammed cleared cars in a check point and mistook two ladies for a man shouldn't have the jobs they currently have.