How quickly the Jew-hating, Palestinian terror apologists forget...
General Discussion LobbyGeneral chit-chat, current events, news and all others...
Hey there!
It looks like you're enjoying Gunco.net but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members and much more. Register now!
Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.
First of all , The NYT is a stock held company , one guy does not own it. Also Turner has not owned CNN in a number of years (over 10 years ago ...1996). Second of all , here is the muslime interpretation of how women corrupt our society.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Yep this lunatic says one thing then denies it when he's caught
a gutless example of you average Jihadi , but i do not mean muslim, Jihadi's are the nuts that want to stir things up and follow the old hate filled wahibi teachings.
Al Queda Jamahl Islamia the philipine alqueda mob all follow this sub weirdos teachings but it aint Islam as a whole ok??
If i remember right Sheik El Wahibi the founder of all this hate junk was ruled a infadel by the then ruling heads of Islam and they made war on his followers until they killed him and every follower they could sadly "the house of saud" had a few cousin of this mob and they protected them....
back to the story
El Halaili is a lying two faced muck raker, was sacked by a democratic vote by most Muslims in Australia, but big money interests backed this nut and so if they vote himm out the Saudi's will stop paying for new Mosques etc...
here we have radicalised muslim gangs hunting christian females and gang raping them, one lot got 55 years . another lot where found buryed in the Kurnell sand hills.
Now they demand special jails just for them as they cant gang up inside the joint as much as outside.
Besides, Skaff, the leader of the rape gang gets bashed every chance folks get, I hear theres a group dedicated to it inside the jails.
These Jihadi's , they are real heroes bashing old ladies when there 5-10 of them and they have a gun or machettes
give the folks back the right to bear arms and all this garbage would stop in one very noisy night.... but without guns only the crims here have them.
Did you celebrated toghether with your palestinian friends on 9/11? Afterall, we just got what we deserved, didn't we?
To quote Obambi's racist pastor: "America's chicken came home to roost". That sounds about right to you, isn't it?
Considering the effort you put in defending the scumbags ululating in the streets at the news 3000 Americans have been murdered, it certainly looks like you felt you've been revenged too that day. Since you sympathize with them so much and consider their cause is just, why don't you have the spine to admit you also shared the same feelings of joy with them?
Just curious: what is the purpose of your trolling on this board? Do you really believe you will convince anyone here to blame America and its ally Israel for the terrorist acts perpetrated the international gang of Islamic murdering lunatics you are apologizing for?
I didn't see anyone defending them - but then again it seems that you see any attempt to point out any wrongs that Israel has done with a way to equate it to supporting Palestinians.
Quote:
Originally Posted by incitatus
Mauser,
As you can clearly see from what our resident neo-nazi pointed in his thin veiled post, the US Ambassador was nothing but a filthy jewish pig. He just got what he deserved.
Same as Daniel Pearl, another zionist pig rightfully beheaded by ImtheGDP's righteous friends.
Time for a ban?
incitatus - A ban? of who you? The admin/mods are the ones who decide if a person is banned - not you! Besides, incitatus, you seem to like to incite people.
Besides I don't think labeling a person a neo-nazi helps get your point across. Rather it shows how frustrated you are in articulating a response to other's viewpoints without name calling.
Quote:
Originally Posted by incitatus
Here she is ladies and gentlemens, Rosie O'Donnell.
Yet another flame attempt (or is name calling a thing that helps you to feel better?)
Quote:
Originally Posted by uzitiger
I've seen the pictures of these 'Palestinians' celebrating the fall of the World Trade Center towers. Why won't CNN (Crescent Nazi News) show them or that filthy rag the New York Times? Bush wants a Palestinian state to reward them for their hatred of the US, this will come back to haunt us.
Unfortunately Israel's government missed a chance to drive these vermin out of the Jewish Land of Israel and make them take their terrorist training centers somewhere else.
InTheGDP is a real dickhead who believes in a Jewish cabal to take over the world. He has a sorry excuse for an imagination.
uzitiger - who's the real dickhead? The one calling the name or the one receiving the flame? It's all a matter of subjective opinion
All -
As I have said before - enough is enough. If you don't like that, then go warm yourself a cup of tea, sit in the corner and relax. While you're relaxing think about what Israel has done wrong and think about what the Palestinians have done wrong. Neither side is perfect and neither side in this situation is right. Pointing things out about what is wrong with some of the things that Israel does does not make a person a Palestinian supporter - just as pointing out things the Palestinians have done wrong make a person a supporter of Israel. In other words, this can be discussed in a friendly, mature way.
__________________ "To show you how radical I am, I want carjackers dead. I want rapists dead. I want burglars dead. I want child molesters dead. I want the bad guys dead. No court case. No parole. No early release. I want 'em dead. Get a gun and when they attack you, shoot 'em."
Ted Nugent - speaking at the NRA convention April 17, 2005
[quote=sniper69;455355]I didn't see anyone defending them - but then again it seems that you see any attempt to point out any wrongs that Israel has done with a way to equate it to supporting Palestinians.
This is a CLASSIC tactic of blanket supporters of Israel. Its so tried and true its the first line of defense usually. The only problem is that its so old that its starting to become worn thin and more and more regular folks are starting to see through the holes.
__________________
only a warrior chooses pacifism; others are condemed to it.
"While you're relaxing think about what Israel has done wrong and think about what the Palestinians have done wrong. Neither side is perfect and neither side in this situation is right. Pointing things out about what is wrong with some of the things that Israel does does not make a person a Palestinian supporter - just as pointing out things the Palestinians have done wrong make a person a supporter of Israel. In other words, this can be discussed in a friendly, mature way."
thats the best advice i've read regarding this subject in a long while...
__________________
only a warrior chooses pacifism; others are condemed to it.
... and this is what I got. Try it. I still haven't found the controlling interest in both NYT or CNN, but I assure you, They probably are exactly what I intuit.
This is my concern, a highly polarized source, controlling ALL of our information.
Read, learn, consider. You know the media is bunk... so the question needs answering.
Who controls the western world's media?
____________________________
Google
An explanation of our search results.
If you recently used Google to search for the word "Jew," you may have seen results that were very disturbing. We assure you that the views expressed by the sites in your results are not in any way endorsed by Google. We'd like to explain why you're seeing these results when you conduct this search.
A site's ranking in Google's search results relies heavily on computer algorithms using thousands of factors to calculate a page's relevance to a given query. Sometimes subtleties of language cause anomalies to appear that cannot be predicted. A search for "Jew" brings up one such unexpected result.
If you use Google to search for "Judaism," "Jewish" or "Jewish people," the results are informative and relevant. So why is a search for "Jew" different? One reason is that the word "Jew" is often used in an anti-Semitic context. Jewish organizations are more likely to use the word "Jewish" when talking about members of their faith. The word has become somewhat charged linguistically, as noted on websites devoted to Jewish topics such as these:
* [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
* [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Someone searching for information on Jewish people would be more likely to enter terms like "Judaism," "Jewish people," or "Jews" than the single word "Jew." In fact, prior to this incident, the word "Jew" only appeared about once in every 10 million search queries. Now it's likely that the great majority of searches on Google for "Jew" are by people who have heard about this issue and want to see the results for themselves.
The beliefs and preferences of those who work at Google, as well as the opinions of the general public, do not determine or impact our search results. Individual citizens and public interest groups do periodically urge us to remove particular links or otherwise adjust search results. Although Google reserves the right to address such requests individually, Google views the comprehensiveness of our search results as an extremely important priority. Accordingly, we do not remove a page from our search results simply because its content is unpopular or because we receive complaints concerning it. We will, however, remove pages from our results if we believe the page (or its site) violates our Webmaster Guidelines, if we believe we are required to do so by law, or at the request of the webmaster who is responsible for the page.
We apologize for the upsetting nature of the experience you had using Google and appreciate your taking the time to inform us about it.
Sincerely,
The Google Team
p.s. You may be interested in some additional information the Anti-Defamation League has posted about this issue at [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]. In addition, we call your attention to Google's search results on this topic.
?2008 Google - Google Home - About Google
... and this is what I got. Try it. I still haven't found the controlling interest in both NYT or CNN, but I assure you, They probably are exactly what I intuit.
This is my concern, a highly polarized source, controlling ALL of our information.
Read, learn, consider. You know the media is bunk... so the question needs answering.
Who controls the western world's media?
____________________________
Google
An explanation of our search results.
If you recently used Google to search for the word "Jew," you may have seen results that were very disturbing. We assure you that the views expressed by the sites in your results are not in any way endorsed by Google. We'd like to explain why you're seeing these results when you conduct this search.
A site's ranking in Google's search results relies heavily on computer algorithms using thousands of factors to calculate a page's relevance to a given query. Sometimes subtleties of language cause anomalies to appear that cannot be predicted. A search for "Jew" brings up one such unexpected result.
If you use Google to search for "Judaism," "Jewish" or "Jewish people," the results are informative and relevant. So why is a search for "Jew" different? One reason is that the word "Jew" is often used in an anti-Semitic context. Jewish organizations are more likely to use the word "Jewish" when talking about members of their faith. The word has become somewhat charged linguistically, as noted on websites devoted to Jewish topics such as these:
Someone searching for information on Jewish people would be more likely to enter terms like "Judaism," "Jewish people," or "Jews" than the single word "Jew." In fact, prior to this incident, the word "Jew" only appeared about once in every 10 million search queries. Now it's likely that the great majority of searches on Google for "Jew" are by people who have heard about this issue and want to see the results for themselves.
The beliefs and preferences of those who work at Google, as well as the opinions of the general public, do not determine or impact our search results. Individual citizens and public interest groups do periodically urge us to remove particular links or otherwise adjust search results. Although Google reserves the right to address such requests individually, Google views the comprehensiveness of our search results as an extremely important priority. Accordingly, we do not remove a page from our search results simply because its content is unpopular or because we receive complaints concerning it. We will, however, remove pages from our results if we believe the page (or its site) violates our Webmaster Guidelines, if we believe we are required to do so by law, or at the request of the webmaster who is responsible for the page.
We apologize for the upsetting nature of the experience you had using Google and appreciate your taking the time to inform us about it.
Sincerely,
The Google Team
p.s. You may be interested in some additional information the Anti-Defamation League has posted about this issue at Google Search Ranking of Hate Sites Not Intentional. In addition, we call your attention to Google's search results on this topic.
?2008 Google - Google Home - About Google
so how did you get the above? I didn't get that searching for the terms you listed. Instead I got a bunch of links and the first one is a youtube video.
__________________ "To show you how radical I am, I want carjackers dead. I want rapists dead. I want burglars dead. I want child molesters dead. I want the bad guys dead. No court case. No parole. No early release. I want 'em dead. Get a gun and when they attack you, shoot 'em."
Ted Nugent - speaking at the NRA convention April 17, 2005
Linear Mode
