All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01 AM.  

Go Back   Gunco.net > GENERAL Discussion Lobby > Polls


Hey there!

It looks like you're enjoying Gunco.net but haven't created an account yet. Why not take a minute to register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to all of our forums and posts plus the ability to post your own messages, communicate directly with other members and much more. Register now!

Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.

View Poll Results: What caliber would YOU select for a 2nd AR?
5.56/.223 8 18.60%
7.62x39 4 9.30%
6.8 SPC 4 9.30%
.243 WSSM 0 0%
6.5 Grendel 10 23.26%
9mm 7 16.28%
other 10 23.26%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 10-09-2008, 04:42 PM   #21 (permalink)
Gunco Regular
 
Rich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 648
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

No one mentioned the 6mm/.223.... I have one and it is very accurate and very easy to make from .223 brass. It was used with some success as a bench rest / sniper cartridge and the only thing you need to change is the barrel, dies, and bullets. Not a particularly fast round, but heavier bullet with great accuracy.
Rich is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Old 10-09-2008, 05:24 PM   #22 (permalink)
gunco irregular
 
moleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Next door to my neighbors house
Posts: 2,138
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
No one mentioned the 6mm/.223.... I have one and it is very accurate and very easy to make from .223 brass. It was used with some success as a bench rest / sniper cartridge and the only thing you need to change is the barrel, dies, and bullets. Not a particularly fast round, but heavier bullet with great accuracy.
I also have one, the brass is cheap and plentiful and I tend to make the 6x45 brass the nickel plated stuff so I don't accidently mix it back with my 223 brass. Both of the barrels I've had have been very accurate. I sold the first barrel a few years ago that would shoot one ragged hole at 100yds because I hadn't used it for a while. I recently picked up my buddies barrel real cheap and it mostly keeps the groups under 3/4" which isn't too shabby either.
moleman is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Old 10-09-2008, 11:59 PM   #23 (permalink)
THE 9mm ADDICT
 
MUSIBIKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,008
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

Grendal is a great hard hitting round. But, is that what you will really need in the turn?

MUSIBIKE
MUSIBIKE is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Old 10-10-2008, 12:17 AM   #24 (permalink)
THE 9mm ADDICT
 
MUSIBIKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,008
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

I do intend to have an AR with .223 ready for the situation.

But, an UZI and an AR with 9mm will support close combat.

I do not intend to get the .308 out until all of the crud is cleaned out with close combat effort.

These guys will be intent on taking resources from the homes as sustainance. Then, we must limit total penetration. If it comes to be, we must defend our homesteads!

But. small arms fire will be all that will be required. I hope!

Please be assured in what you will need to do. Do NOT over step your bounds with firearms! Don't ever do what you would be sorry for later when it is too late!

PLEASE, verify your targets!
Never fire upon what you are not is sure is enemy force.
NEVER fire upon disclosed friendly!

Calm down and verify that your fire support is positive!

If not, suppress fire until directed to administer fire support in a reasonable fashion.

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

MUSIBIKE
MUSIBIKE is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Old 10-10-2008, 12:38 AM   #25 (permalink)
Gunco Member
 
DMGunn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 37
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Wow. I don't think the OP mentioned an end-of-civilization caliber. For that, the fabulous Grendel would not be in my top ten.

Number one on my end-of-the-world to-do list? I would hook a large plasma TV to a dish and a generator and place it somewhere (else). Then let 'em fight over the remote. Seems thats all it would take these days....
__________________
The Second Amendment - it's not about hunting.
DMGunn is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 10-10-2008, 12:57 PM   #26 (permalink)
THE 9mm ADDICT
 
MUSIBIKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,008
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

Nobody believed we might have a MUSLIM president who does not salute the American flag.
Watch what happens to what we consider civilization around this time next year if he gets elected.

They will not be looking for your TV. The wife and daughters will be first.........
MUSIBIKE is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Old 10-10-2008, 05:31 PM   #27 (permalink)
Gunco Member
 
BigDdy31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 82
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I'd suggest the 9mm but just so I can live vicariously through you. In my mind, the 9mm would make an excellent short-medium range carbine. The round can really take advantage of more barrel length than it's usually given.

I really want to build one as my first AR but it will be ages until I can pop that much dough. There's AK business to do first.

What I really, really want is one that takes Glock mags so it will match my daily carry sidearm but the only people who make them are Olympic and I haven't heard great things about them PLUS they don't sell parts, just complete rifles.
BigDdy31 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 10-10-2008, 06:24 PM   #28 (permalink)
THE 9mm ADDICT
 
MUSIBIKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,008
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

That is why I like the 9mm AR. Mine uses the same mags as my UZI. Just a little notch cut in the mag to make it work in the AR. It still works in the UZI too.

A 9mm AR will run you $1000.00 to put together one from Rock River Arms. A bit more than a .223 version. A mag adapter, different hammer, heavier buffer and, different upper assembly. I like that 9mm does not require a gas tube. Simple blow back.

At 50 meters I can get a mag full into a 12 inch circle with only iron sights. In a close combat situation, that will do you a lot more good than a higher powered AR that pulls up and has a much larger give you away muzzel flash.

Good accuracy with enough power to do some hard hitting quickly.

MUSIBIKE
MUSIBIKE is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Old 10-10-2008, 08:30 PM   #29 (permalink)
Gunco Veteran
 
gunnysmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wyo
Posts: 1,310
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

6.5 MPC just google it.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
__________________
In Honor of He who gave all January 8. 1945.
42nd Rainbow 242 ID Co D
gunnysmith is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 10-10-2008, 11:26 PM   #30 (permalink)
THE 9mm ADDICT
 
MUSIBIKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,008
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

Grendal would be better used in a heavier weapon.

Too much power.

Fracturing an engine block on a half track.

Getting into the rotor of that RUSSIAN copter.

Serious sniper duty.

But, for quick and adjile close combat, it will be 9mm for us.

MUSIBIKE
MUSIBIKE is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01 AM.
Style By: vBSkinworks

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0