Gunco Forums banner

DHS Use Police Depts to Gather Intel on Citizens & Label Them Extremist Threats

1K views 7 replies 6 participants last post by  Bradrock 
#1 ·
DHS Use Police Depts to Gather Intel on Citizens & Label Them Extremist Threats

Susanne Posel

According to the White House Blog website, the Obama administration is working to “counter online radicalization” by “violent extremist groups” such as “al-Qaeda and its affiliates and adherents, violent supremacist groups, and violent ‘sovereign citizens’.”

The White House claims that “these groups use the Internet to disseminate propaganda, identify and groom potential recruits, and supplement their real-world recruitment” with “resources to propagate messages of violence and division.” Through the exploitation of “popular media, music videos and online video games”, allegedly there are “countless opportunities “to draw targets into private exchanges” and provide “violent extremists with access to new audiences and instruments for radicalization.”

DHS Use Police Depts to Gather Intel on Citizens & Label Them Extremist Threats



The US government stated they will combat these extremist groups by “raising awareness about the threat and providing communities with practical information and tools for staying safe online.” They are solidifying their relationships with private sector corporations involved in technology to implement “policies, technologies, and tools that can help counter violent extremism online.”

The 2011 document entitled “Empowering Local Partners to Prevent Violent Extremism in the United States” outlines how a “comprehensive strategy” to counter the influence of al-Qaeda is being championed by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) with digital information sharing and coordinating intelligence with local law enforcement to thwart terrorist plots and “save many American lives”.

Using propaganda, under the guise of “local partners in their grassroots efforts to prevent violent extremism” the federal government is building a network with local law enforcement against the threat of radicalization online and in the real-world.

The document names plots devised by neo-Nazis, anti-Semitic hate groups, racial supremacists, international and domestic terrorists inspired by al-Qaeda as a threat to the US. The federal government is utilizing local police departments to build a “local level . . . resilience against violent extremism.”

america_today



DHS trains local police officers at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) provides funding to local police departments to send their officers to FLETC to receive militarized education in tactical operations.

FLETC has locations in Georgia, New Mexico, South Carolina, and Washington DC. This federal militarization of local police extends to international policing agencies which “develops, coordinates, manages, and delivers international training and technical assistance that promotes the rule of law and supports U.S. foreign policy.”

Another report the White House is using to justify the demonization of US citizens as radical extremists is entitled “Strategic Implementation Plan for Empowering Local Partners to Prevent Violent Extremism in the United States”. This report, published in December of 2011, further reinforces the role of local police departments to ‘address community needs and concerns, including protecting rights and public safety.”

The federal government acquires platforms to infiltrate communities they have identified as potentially under threat of violent extremist groups. Across the nation, senior officials are deployed with the assistance of fake grassroots propaganda to partner with “Governor-appointed Homeland Security Advisors, Major Cities Chiefs, Mayors’ Offices, and local partners.”

Training of local police department officers to paramilitarize and integrate them into military tactical operations is the key to combating localized extremism.
Over the last few years the DHS have been indoctrinating local police departments into “non-Federal law enforcement agencies” as outlined in the DHS directive from the Office for State and Local Law Enforcement (SLLE).

DHS is successful in their relationship with local police departments all across the nation because they are contracted private security firms (or hired armed guards) that are placed in a city or town to secure the population and generate revenue for the local government.

In early 2012, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released a report entitled “Homeland Security and Intelligence: Next Steps in Evolving the Mission” which outlined in part on how to redirect efforts of the federal government from international terrorism toward home-grown terrorists and build a DHS-controlled police force agency that would control all cities and towns through the use of local police departments.

DHS maintains that “the threat grows more localized” which necessitates the militarization of local police in major cities in the US and the training of staff from local agencies to make sure that oversight is restricted to the federal government.

Countering online extremism is a task allocated to the DHS who have identified “behaviors, tactics, and other indicators that could point to potential terrorist activity.” DHS will host conferences for local police departments and federal partners to attend that will provide education on countering extremism.

Other “training initiatives” include “hundreds of thousands of front line officers” who are the ground-force infantry needed by DHS to “prevent” extremist activities.

The “If You See Something, Say Something” campaign is specifically designed to target local communities to turn ordinary citizens into a Stasi for the federal government with the local police department allocated as their first line of intelligence gathering.

Intelligence on citizens who are supposed to be extremists is gathered from multiple avenues such as:

• Local government
• Local law enforcement
• Parent/Teacher Associations
• School district officials
• Influential members of local communities
• Religious leaders

These collaborations provide “critical information” and real-time “ assessments of [any] threat” to local communities and incorporate this information into training programs and federal initiatives.

Susanne Posel’s Website is Occupy Corporatism.

DHS Use Police Depts to Gather Intel on Citizens & Label Them Extremist Threats | Pakalert Press...



Black Blade: Just the tip of the iceberg. There are an endless list of alphabet soup agencies that exist for the sole purpose to spy on, intimidate, incarcerate and even kill those deemed by the Party to be "enemies of the state". That's just about everyone.
 
See less See more
2
#2 ·
It does not sound like much has changed under the bullet point items...
Those avenues have traditionally provided info/data on threats to national security.

What is new is the huge data banks being built to store virtually all traffic on just about anything happening in the world of information.
 
#4 ·
I might mention that the new Obamascare medical crap has provisions for doctors to spy on us and try to find out if we have guns and are capable of owning them (in a doctor's opinion). The last time I filled out a form for a doctor's office one of the questions was: "Do you have a gun in your home?). I left it blank. But, that may not be possible under the Obama Bin Lyin' medicrap plan.
 
#5 ·
The AMA has been recommending their members ask about firearms ownership to establish "risk." Supposedly a couple of medical insurance carriers also ask for firearms ownership information. There have also been numerous reports of schools asking children if their parents had any guns.

Again, they've been doing this since the 1980s at least. When I used to try to tell people about it they acted like I just claimed to have beamed down from the mothership. Now they get all hot and bothered, and can't understand why I'm not.
 
#8 ·
All of these lists sound just what we were taught the Soviet Union did , when I was in grade school in the fifties.
They also encouraged people to spy on their neighbors for " suspicious" activity.

Sound familiar???...............
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top