Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: An analysis of media coverage of Sandy Brook shooting

  1. #1
    jrs
    jrs is offline
    B.U.F. (Bald, Ugly, Fat) jrs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    PRK
    Posts
    1,490
    Feedback Score
    0

    Default An analysis of media coverage of Sandy Brook shooting

    Sandy Hook massacre: Official story spins out of control

    The massacre of 20 children and 7 adults at the Sandy Hook elementary school last Friday was one more in a long line of atrocious mass murders committed in the USA. By now, four days later, an official version of events has more or less solidified to explain the chain of events. The familiar 'lone gunman' narrative has once more stoked the hot-button issue of gun control and left the general population as clueless as ever as to why people suddenly 'go postal' and target the most vulnerable members of society.

    On closer inspection, however, there is clearly more to many of these mass shootings than meets the eye. Very often the earliest reports present information that directly contradicts key foundations of the final 'official' analysis of events. Granted, confusion is natural when a story breaks, but some of the initial reports conflict so completely with the lone gunman narrative that I'm going to compile them here and then try to put this tragedy in a more objective context. In his speech at the Sandy Hook Interfaith Prayer Vigil in Newtown, Connecticut on Sunday night, President Obama quoted the following biblical passage:

    "So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal."

    ~ 2 Corinthians 4:18


    The traumatised Newtown community deserves the facts without the spin. Everyone touched by this brutal event deserves to know what really happened, so let's fix our eyes on what remains unseen...

    A 20-year-old 'tech geek' named Adam Lanza is supposed to have snapped early last Friday, December 14th, shot dead his mother Nancy Lanza, loaded her car up with her guns and ammo, then driven it across town to his former school, the Sandy Hook Elementary School, shot dead 27 people in two classrooms and an adjoining hallway, then turned one of his guns on himself.

    That's how most will now remember the shooting, but is that actually what happened?

    All the child victims were first-graders between the ages of 6 and 7. If there's any saving grace to be found in this event, it's that it was all over within minutes. Police were reportedly on the scene "instantaneously" and by then the shooting had ended. Listed among the slain school teachers and administrative staff was the school principal, 47-year-old Dawn Hochsprung. Right here we encounter our first problem:

    The Newtown Bee
    December 14, 2012

    Sandy Hook School Principal Dawn Hochsprung told The Bee that a masked man entered the school with a rifle and started shooting multiple shots - more than she could count - that went "on and on."

    <skipping stuff>


    One brave teacher, Kaitlin Roig, bundled a bunch of children into a bathroom and locked the door. What's interesting about her testimony to ABC News is that when police arrived and asked her to open the door, she refused, saying that "if they were really cops, they'd know where to find keys to open the door." In addition, she requested that they slide their badges under the door.

    Now, this is generally a smart thing to do in any and all interactions with the police, especially in the U.S. But to have the wherewithal to do so under such traumatic circumstances strongly suggests that Ms. Roig had logically deduced by that point that multiple perpetrators were involved, and that they were either impersonating police officers or were indistinguishable from SWAT team police commandos, either in the way they dressed or the way they behaved upon entering the building. It also reminds us just how narrow the time window of the actual shooting was. The shooting appears to have barely ended when men knocked on that bathroom door and told Ms. Roig they were police.

    There are also conflicting reports about how the gunmen entered the building. We were told initially that they came in through the main front entrance and proceeded straight to the administrators'/principal's offices. But Sandy Hook elementary school has a security system with a video monitor, which allows staff to screen visitors before buzzing them in. A "masked gunman dressed in black tactical combat gear" from head to toe would kinda raise red flags, don't you think?

    Another possible anomaly is that Victoria Soto, one of the teachers killed at the school, appears to have had an 'in memoriam' Facebook page created in her name four days before the shooting.

    Regarding this alleged 'LIBOR scandal' connection between this shooting and the Aurora theater shooting, there is as yet zero evidence to support the claim that either father of Lanza or Holmes were going to testify to anyone about anything, so for now this must remain just another rumor. I rather think that this is being spread to create the impression of a direct link that can be easily refuted, as in a straw man argument. The obvious and direct link staring everyone in the face is that the U.S. government's accounts of these events are hocus-pocus. The glaring connection between these two shootings, the Sikh Temple shooting and the Fort Hood shooting is that multiple gunmen were reported at the time by eyewitnesses, but they are now all officially claimed to have been carried out by 'lone gunmen'. This logically tells us that the real perpetrators are being protected with cover stories of what really happened because if the truth were known, some section of the U.S. government would be implicated.

    Wade Michael Page, the 'lone gunman' in the Sikh Temple shooting in Wisconsin in August this year, was a highly decorated U.S. army psychological operations specialist, according to the Pentagon. But what happened to the three other gunmen seen by witnesses? It can't surely be coincidence that Wade was (former?) military psy-ops. The thought has crossed my mind more than once during the aftermath of the Connecticut shooting. Others too have suggested this was a 'false-flag' event, or that Lanza was some sort of Manchurian Candidate.

    But maybe there's a simpler explanation (albeit more outrageous) than that? Was that really Adam Lanza they found inside the school? Do we even know for a fact that one of the gunmen was found dead inside the school? What we have instead are reports of two or three masked gunmen, apparently all dressed similarly in black tactical gear from head to toe, being wilfully forgotten about at best, or protected by the state at worst. Based on the authorities' persistent but futile efforts to connect the Lanzas to this school, the multiple eyewitness reports of two shooters, the Connecticut State Medical Examiner's report that all the victims were riddled with bullets from a rifle that we're simultaneously being asked to believe was in the trunk of a car the whole time, similar reports of multiple shooters in previous mass shootings in recent years and the media focusing the emotional outcry onto the hot-button topic of gun control ... I'm left wondering if this was actually the work of some highly trained professional hit team?

    Was the massacre at Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, a psy-op, using what amounts to a 'death squad' and a carefully planned mission to terrorise people on behalf of the government, in combination with perception management to shape the narrative and vector the emotional fallout?

    Gun control isn't the issue here. The US government would long since have taken measures, quietly, to limit the supply of weapons, the 2nd Amendment of the constitution be damned (it's "just a goddamned piece of paper", remember?), if it was really concerned with limiting civilian access to weapons.

    The psychopaths in power have absolutely no compunction about using state terrorism, in this case organising the deliberate massacre of innocent children, to control people. In effect, this is little different from the U.S. government calls counter-insurgency or counter-terrorism in foreign countries, where it attacks innocent civilians to create the impression that they were killed by 'communists', 'terrorists', 'insurgents' or 'militants', with the aim of generating public support for the illusion that the common people need a strong, ruthless government to protect them from the 'evil-doers'. When the common people buy into this manipulation, the end result, as history shows repeatedly, is an overt and brutal police state.


    Read the entire article here:

    Sandy Hook massacre: Official story spins out of control -- Puppet Masters -- Sott.net
    jrs
    --
    "A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within.", Will Durant

    "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.", Edmund Burke

  2. #2
    Gunco Addicted for life j427x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    9,329
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)

    Default

    yes i have been getting that "rat" like smell from the very start of this.

    you ever hear of "the law of coincidences" once you have above a certain number of coincidences --you better start looking real hard for the facts.

    one of the little things that bugs me is ruger got a government contract with the DOD just a month or so back.

    now sales of ruger firearms have been very strong to the public and they have been making a lot of 'killing" excuse the pun-- selling to the public. the government has laughed at ruger before so why bother now with record sales to the public?

    and just before this disaster that looks as if it is going to restrict the citizens rights ruger just so happens to get a gov military contract?

    ironically ruger was the first to jump ship and get into bed with the government on the last ban----so their sort of the red herring jumping here--

    and the timing of this disaster is also optimal for the administration to get everything it wants and have the best chances of getting their laws passed.

    it is far too many happy coincidences for the Obama and co.

    you got all kinds of little details that don't add up on the crime scene.

    then we have the media going off on some kind of 24/7 manic-depressive coverage of all the personal aspects of the murders while followed by blatant anti-firearms propaganda?

    in fact the medias anti-firearms bias had gotten more intense BEFORE the murders--all most as if the media was trying to build up steam for some big event--

    we even got academics trying to re-write history to downplay firearms --

    but it is all just a coincidence ---

  3. #3
    GuncoHolic 2ndAmendican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Taylors, S.C.
    Posts
    4,574
    Feedback Score
    34 (100%)

    Default

    That's the same kind of feeling that I had the second I heard about the shooting. The law of averages/coincidences just start looking off. The number of "mass shootings" in the US starting with the Aurora shooting, and the strange tie in between the government and the perpetrators, the claims by witnesses that there were "multiple shooters" at almost every one of them, and the progressively escalating nature of the shootings. Movie theater, church, elementary school. Next would have to be a Shriner's Hospital for burned and crippled children.


    There is definitely something fishy going on here.
    Enforcement, NOT Amnesty!!!!!!

    "If they’re going to come here illegally, apply for & receive assistance through a corrupted Government agency encouraging this lawless behavior, work under the table & send billions of dollars each year back to their families in Mexico, while bleeding local economies dry, protest in our streets waving their Mexican flags DEMANDING rights, while I have to press ’1′ for English, then they need to be shipped back to where they came from!" -Chad Miller

  4. #4
    Gunco Addicted for life j427x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    9,329
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)

    Default

    i am not going to stick my neck out and say "conspiracy" but there is damn sure enough strangeness to make one wonder--

    and we got that BATF- fast and furious background where the US government was funneling thousands AKMs and other weapons into the hands of mexican drug cartels when they were supposed to be stopping that kind of activity. and this resulted in the murder of US agents and citizens.

    so there is a history of 'black-op false flag" BS by this very administration against its own people-- the US citizens. this does not inspire any confidence in the administration.

    some independent entity needs to at least look into it at the very least, IMHO.

  5. #5
    I am my favorite American gunnerxxx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    283
    Feedback Score
    0

    Default

    I'll say this.... I dont believe our enemies are foreign anymore! God bless the families of the slain for they have suffered the most, for the rest of us ours is to come. I smell a coverup.

  6. #6
    TRX
    TRX is online now
    Gunco Irregular TRX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Central Arkansas
    Posts
    2,635
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)

    Default

    ...and Iraqui News Minister Guy seems to have found a new job in Iran:

    "Iran Blames ‘Israeli Death Squads’ for Sandy Hook Shooting"

    Iran Blames Israel for Sandy Hook Shooting - Global Agenda - News - Israel National News

Search tags for this page

There are currently no search engine referrals.
Click on a term to search our site for related topics.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •