Not in my life time.
Does anyone know anything about this?
Does anyone know anything about this?
While you were watching the oil spill, the New York failed terrorist bombing and other critical crises, Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN.
OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT
On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a
Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States
On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States . The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened.
Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment. This has happened in other countries, past and present!
THIS IS NOT A JOKE NOR A FALSE WARNING.
As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control. Read the Article U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto. The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article Here
While you were watching the oil spill, the New York failed terrorist bombing and other critical crises, Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN.
OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT
AND USES IT. IF THIS PASSES, THERE could BE WAR
On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a
Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States
On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States . The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened.
Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment. This has happened in other countries, past and present!
THIS IS NOT A JOKE NOR A FALSE WARNING.
As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control. Read the Article U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto. The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article Here
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
This is like that one where you would have to report you firearms on your income tax. Scare tactics.
Clinton could sign anything. As a statement, politically it might be good for her and the administration. But, it's only a statement.
Until that happens, it's all smoke and mirrors.
"He" being the President. Not the Secretary of State. Plus, 2/3 of the Senate must affirm else there is no treaty.The Constitution of the United States said:He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur
Until that happens, it's all smoke and mirrors.
Problem is, the other countries that gave up guns didn't have ********.
:nanabang::lol:Problem is, the other countries that gave up guns didn't have ********.
Excuse my french, but what a cunt. She's as bad (and ugly) as Janet Reno.Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN.
No, worse than Janet Reno. You got to be pretty bad to be worse than Janet Reno, and just as ugly, too.
If I recall my civics properly, ambassadors don't sign treaties, although they are involved in arranging them. It would be the president who would sign a treaty. As much as they would like, a treaty which violates the Constitution would be illegal. Of course, it wouldn't be the first time they tried to wipe their butts with it... lock and load time.
If I recall my civics properly, ambassadors don't sign treaties, although they are involved in arranging them. It would be the president who would sign a treaty. As much as they would like, a treaty which violates the Constitution would be illegal. Of course, it wouldn't be the first time they tried to wipe their butts with it... lock and load time.
hillary is sec of state. so in her mind SHE IS GOD! i bet in private she tell the big "O" what to do.:nanabang:
:drunk::grumble:
It's a smokescreen to cover up the crap mccain/lieberman are trying to do.
I think one small fact is being left out. The Senate must ratify the treaty by a 2/3 majority. That's not going to happen.
This is Washington speak of testing the waters to see what public reaction will be. The one who really stepped in the dog shit was the head of ICE on immigration, this guy should be drug down Washington Ave, if there any Republicans with ball's in office,we need public hearings about selective enforcement of the LAW, if they want to ignore Arizona law just what other laws are they ready to ignore or skirt around. They took a oath to defend the Constitution and the law of the land, if not its time they resign!!!!!!!!Clinton could sign anything. As a statement, politically it might be good for her and the administration. But, it's only a statement.
"He" being the President. Not the Secretary of State. Plus, 2/3 of the Senate must affirm else there is no treaty.
Until that happens, it's all smoke and mirrors.
Lets start at the top and work down
:geezer::grumble::rant:
This couldn't be more incorrect.On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States . The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments.
First, as previously noted, the Senate would have to approve the treaty.
Second, if that happened, it would not mean that US citizens would be subject to the laws of other nations. The US government would be bound by the terms of the treaty.
Third, and most importantly, if the treaty required the Congress to pass laws that were effective in the US, those laws still have to be Constitutional. A Federal law banning the posession of firearms would be unconstitutional. That's what the Heller case held.
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Gunco Forums
A forum community dedicated to AK-47 and AR-15 firearm owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums
Recommended Communities
