Gunco Forums banner
1 - 16 of 16 Posts

· Gunco Samurai
Joined
·
3,404 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Is it just the barrel and bolt, or is it alot more than that? Outer barrel diameter? Trunnion? Lower Rails? :thankyou:
 

· Gunco Samurai
Joined
·
3,404 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Thanks guys!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
651 Posts
Picture this one, guys...
You buy a kit... say a '74 in 5.45. you screw the front trunnion.
You buy a 7.62 barrel, bolt, and trunnion, which is drilled and tapped.
You buy a 5.56 barrel, bolt, and trunnion, and drill and tap that.
could you interchange without too much hassle on one receiver, just by unscrewing the trunnion bolts, and changing barrels? Stupid Idea?
 

· Gunco Samurai
Joined
·
3,404 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
Hmmmmm, Maybe I need to bring that up to Meeper, since the Beowulf RPK would be using 5.56 mags anyway, Galil to be specific. Maybe I could interchange 5.56 and .50 cal barrels.....That would be BAD ASS.
 

· Visiting MOD
Joined
·
2,235 Posts
problem is that the receiver is different on the 7.62 compared to the 545/556

You could do that on the 545 and 556 with out any hassle.
But the 7.62 has a slightly wider mag.
 

· Happy Camper
Joined
·
7,801 Posts
I've thought about the same thing - a bolt-change caliber conversion :D

I've done some reading on this for some time and there are actually two 5.56 versions floating around out there. Problem is, as I recall, is that no "official" 5.56 caliber was created, only by aftermarket factories like Norinco. So watch it with the trunions.

As I recall, the Chinese 5.56 version uses a 7.62 sized bolt and trunion, and all parts except the bolt would interchange w/ any other Chinese 7.62 part.

THe other caliber is that from the Romanian / Euro factories and I think those are the ones that use the 5.45 bolt/trunion.

SOOOO... you couldn't use a Bulgy/Romy bolt in a Chinese rifle, and vise versa. I think there's even a 3rd pattern but don't remember at all.

I'm going to build one from the ground-up and use all Euro parts (probably from K-Var).

Again, I'm doing this from memory and never bookmarked those threads. Check the gunsnet Norinco forums. There's more about how magazines interchange than anything else, but there are some discussions about the bolts.

As far as the receiver, you could enlarge the rec to accomodate any mag, since the mag well dimples keep it in place. Don't see any problem with that.

hth,
- Jerry
 

· Registered
Joined
·
826 Posts
The only differences between the norinco .223 and the 7.62 appear to be a different bolt as you say with the same carrier (so you could swap bolts). The outer bolt diameter also appears to be consistent. Further, as you say, polytec made its own .223 version so I can't comment on that, what I can add though is that norinco, polytec and SARs all use different mags.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
60 Posts
DrugRunR said:
problem is that the receiver is different on the 7.62 compared to the 545/556

You could do that on the 545 and 556 with out any hassle.
But the 7.62 has a slightly wider mag.
Yep + the trunions are different.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,676 Posts
With the SAR-3 5.56 AK, the parts that are specific to that weapon and not found on any other AK are the gas block, the bolt carrier, the bolt assembly, and the hammer. Have not a clue why they changed so many things from standard AKM/AK-74 design.
 

· Visiting MOD
Joined
·
2,235 Posts
Also here is something

I own a SAM 5 in 5.56, and 3 5.45 other rifles.
On the 5.56 there seems to be 2 styles
Style 1 uses a 7.62zx39 Bolt carrier (large bolt)
Style 2 uses a 5.45x39 Bolt Carrier (small bolt)

My sam5 uses style #1, but the Krink kits offered by K-var in 5.56 uses style #2

GO figure
 
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top